Current:Home > ScamsWisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections -Momentum Wealth Path
Wisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections
View
Date:2025-04-16 16:24:15
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin voters on Tuesday were deciding on two Republican-backed constitutional amendments, one of which would ban the use of private money to run elections in reaction to grants received in 2020 that were funded by Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg.
The other proposal would require that only election officials designated by law can administer elections. That is already the law, but adding that language to the Wisconsin Constitution would make it harder to repeal.
Democrats opposed both measures, which they argued would make it more difficult to conduct elections in the presidential battleground state.
Polls are open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. following an early, in-person absentee voting period that began two weeks ago.
Both proposed constitutional amendments are in response to grant money that came to Wisconsin in 2020 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a liberal group that fights for voter access. That year, the center received a $300 million donation from Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan to help election officials buy supplies and run elections at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic before vaccines were available.
The state’s five largest cities, all of which President Joe Biden won, received $8.8 million. They were among roughly 200 communities in Wisconsin that received around $10 million as part of $350 million given out nationally.
Republicans who dubbed the money “Zuckerbucks” complained the bulk of the funds went to Democratic strongholds and claimed it was an attempt by the billionaire to tip the vote in favor of Democrats. The argument came amid false claims made by former President Donald Trump and his supporters that widespread voter fraud led to Biden’s 2020 win.
Since 2020, Republicans in at least 27 states have outlawed or restricted private elections grants.
The Wisconsin measures are supported by Republicans and conservative groups, including the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty and Election Integrity for Wisconsin. They are opposed by an array of government watchdog and liberal groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Common Cause Wisconsin, Wisconsin Conservation Voters and the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin.
Not a single Democratic lawmaker voted for the amendment, which was then split into two questions on the ballot. Opponents of the amendments worry they could lead to attempts to stifle current practices enhancing voter participation.
Three courts and the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission rejected complaints challenging the legality of the grant money.
Republicans, who control the Legislature, brought the constitutional amendments to circumvent Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, who almost surely would have vetoed the measures. Amendments are not subject to the governor’s approval.
Wisconsin voters have approved 148 out of 200 proposed constitutional amendments since the state constitution was adopted in 1848, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- This cellular atlas could lead to breakthroughs for endometriosis patients
- Summer School 2: Competition and the cheaper sneaker
- Here's what happens to the body in extreme temperatures — and how heat becomes deadly
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Study Shows Protected Forests Are Cooler
- EPA Paused Waste Shipments From Ohio Train Derailment After Texas Uproar
- Summer School 1: Planet Money goes to business school
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Study Shows Protected Forests Are Cooler
Ranking
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- “Strong and Well” Jamie Foxx Helps Return Fan’s Lost Purse During Outing in Chicago
- Amid a record heat wave, Texas construction workers lose their right to rest breaks
- Is ‘Chemical Recycling’ a Solution to the Global Scourge of Plastic Waste or an Environmentally Dirty Ruse to Keep Production High?
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Finally, Some Good Climate News: The Biggest Wins in Clean Energy in 2022
- Trader Joe's has issued recalls for 2 types of cookies that could contain rocks
- A New Push Is on in Chicago to Connect Urban Farmers With Institutional Buyers Like Schools and Hospitals
Recommendation
Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
Natural gas can rival coal's climate-warming potential when leaks are counted
Cory Wharton's Baby Girl Struggles to Breathe in Gut-Wrenching Teen Mom Preview
Why Emily Blunt Is Taking a Year Off From Acting
Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
Rooftop Solar Is Becoming More Accessible to People with Lower Incomes, But Not Fast Enough
Gabrielle Union Has the Best Response to Critics of Her Cheeky Swimsuits
In Court, the Maryland Public Service Commission Quotes Climate Deniers and Claims There’s No Such Thing as ‘Clean’ Energy